Skip to content

Christie’s cancels T rex skeleton public sale after doubts raised | Dinosaurs


    Christie’s has referred to as off the public sale of a Tyrannosaurus rex skeleton days earlier than it was as a consequence of go below the hammer in Hong Kong after a US fossil firm raised doubts about elements of the skeleton named “Shen”.

    Christie’s stated in an announcement that Shen – a 1,400kg (3,100lb) skeleton – had been withdrawn from its autumn auctions week, which begins in Hong Kong on Friday.

    “The consignor has now determined to mortgage the specimen to a museum for public show,” it stated.

    Excavated from Montana, Shen stands 4.6 metres (15ft) tall and 12 metres lengthy, and is regarded as an grownup male that lived about 67m years in the past. Its public sale would have adopted the sale by Christie’s of one other T rex skeleton named “Stan” for $31.8m (£27m) in 2020.

    It is rather uncommon for full dinosaur skeletons to be discovered, in keeping with the Discipline Museum in Chicago, one of many largest pure historical past museums on the planet. Most frames on show use casts of bones to finish the skeleton. The Discipline Museum estimates the variety of bones in a T rex to be 380.

    Christie’s authentic supplies stated about 80 of Shen’s bones have been authentic.

    The controversy was sparked when Peter Larson, the president of the Black Hills Institute of Geological Analysis within the US, informed the New York Instances that elements of Shen seemed much like Stan.

    The Black Hills Institute holds the mental property rights to Stan, even after its sale in 2020, and it sells replicas of that skeleton.

    Larson informed the newspaper it appeared to him that Shen’s proprietor – not recognized by Christie’s – used bones from a Stan reproduction to finish the skeleton. Its spokesperson, Edward Lewine, informed the newspaper that Christie’s believed Shen “would profit from additional research”.

    Gross sales of such skeletons have raked in tens of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} lately, however specialists have described the commerce as dangerous to science because the auctions might put them in non-public arms and out of the attain of researchers.