Skip to content

Noseband tightness beneath evaluation in new printed examine


  • New knowledge has shone a lightweight on riders’ attitudes to noseband tightness – as Canada takes steps in the direction of implementing new tack guidelines.

    In January, H&H reported that Equestrian Canada (EC) had launched a noseband-measuring pilot challenge, with the view of implementing a rule that displays scientific suggestions; {that a} horse’s noseband “shouldn’t be tight sufficient to forestall the position of two grownup fingers between the noseband and the frontal nasal aircraft” (information, 13 January).

    At present EC’s guidelines say that abuse of horses at EC-sanctioned competitions is just not tolerated. Acts of cruelty can embody nosebands utilized in such a manner that they intervene with the horse’s respiratory, or tight sufficient to trigger ache or discomfort.

    As a part of the challenge stewards measured the tightness of 551 nosebands throughout 32 competitions utilizing the Worldwide Society for Equitation (ISES) taper gauge, a software that exactly measures the area between the noseband and nasal aircraft. Greater than 1,500 EC members additionally took half in a survey on noseband match – and potential rule modifications.

    Researchers have now printed the findings from the work, in Animals. Of the 551 measurements taken, 71% handed the 1.5cm (two fingers) measurement; 19% handed 1cm (one finger); and 10% had been too tight to suit the taper gauge. Stewards unanimously agreed that over-tightened nosebands current a welfare concern; 60% believed the present guidelines are adequate and 40% didn’t. Stewards additionally commented on different points, corresponding to nosebands being positioned too excessive or too low.

    Of the 1,528 survey respondents, solely 181 skilled riders felt over-tightened nosebands had been a welfare concern, in comparison with 613 novice opponents. General, 326 of respondents stated having the ability to match just one finger between the noseband and nasal aircraft was acceptable. Simply over 74% of respondents largely agreed that every one disciplines ought to have the identical standardised guidelines for noseband match and {that a} measurement gauge was a good technique to measure this – however solely 65% agreed that noseband match must be measured on the nasal aircraft.

    The researchers mentioned that noseband match relied on many elements, together with the breed and conformation of the horse and the kind of noseband used.

    “Whereas the noseband taper gauge admittedly can not account for all sorts of head conformation, it’s inside the realm of science to create a gauge that might,” they stated.

    “For now, although, a standardised rule throughout the board will not be nicely acquired by opponents who already really feel weighed down by guidelines.”

    The researchers concluded that misinformation and misunderstanding of noseband analysis was evident, indicating a necessity for the training of riders and coaches on the significance of applicable noseband match – and the implications of over-tightened nosebands.

    “Making nosebands optionally available in disciplines that at the moment require them was urged. Regardless of differing viewpoints, there was a transparent need to enhance equine high quality of life,” they stated.

    An EC spokesman informed H&H the physique launched the challenge to research the necessity for and acceptance of recent requirements to noseband measuring, earlier than they formulated a rule-change proposal.

    “EC is eager to share and assist the outcomes of the paper in addition to the info collected to additional inform the group and supply info relating to the rule change proposal that has been submitted to the nationwide guidelines committee,” stated the spokesman.

  • [ad_2]